For companies with a board, a brand book and four people who have to approve the homepage. $200 to start and $49 a month, both coming off the price — no corporate surcharge, and no four-figure invoice before the site exists.










The corporate site rarely fails on craft. It fails because eight opinions each got a paragraph, and what shipped says nothing that anybody outside the company can use.
The process is the deliverable here. You name one decision-maker, feedback is collected in writing, and it happens twice — not continuously until everyone is tired.
Not a shop window. A working asset: company profile, capability pages and case material that somebody in procurement can forward without adding an apology.
“Our old website was years behind the business. Daniel rebuilt it from scratch and now runs our SEO — one point of contact, and things move without chasing.”

“We needed a professional presence to reach European clients. Daniel built the website and set up Google Ads, and inquiries increased significantly.”

Yes. If something in it genuinely will not work on a screen — a colour that fails contrast, a typeface with no web licence — I will tell you and propose the smallest fix, not redesign your brand.
Yes, with proper structure so each language can rank in its own market. Translation quality is yours to approve; I will not pretend a machine translation is a translation.
I do. That is the offer and the limit of it. For a corporate build it also means no junior inherits the project halfway through.
Longer than an SME site, because approvals take longer — and the timeline is agreed in writing before anything starts, including what happens when a review round slips.
Because the monthly pays for hosting, updates and edits, and those cost me the same whether the site has six pages or sixty. Charging you more for the word «corporate» would be a pricing decision, not a cost one.
Corporate sites share most of their spine with these three.
One call. What is costing you credibility, what I would change, and what it would take — including whether a rebuild is premature.